Use It or Lose It: Why Trademark Protection Depends on Real Business Use

SF Simon Fouladi
Posted in Updated
Use It or Lose It: Why Trademark Protection Depends on Real Business Use

Trademark protection follows a simple rule. What you don't use, you lose. You see this in everyday life. A muscle weakens when you stop training it. A language slips when you stop speaking it. Trademarks follow the same pattern under the trademark use requirement.

In the European Union, the protection of an EU trade mark depends on genuine use for the goods and services listed in the registration. If a company cannot demonstrate real use, rights can be limited or revoked.

What genuine use actually means

Genuine use means real, public and outward commercial use of the trade mark as an indication of origin for the relevant goods or services. The use should be intended to create or preserve a market for those goods or services.

Token activity carried out only to keep a registration alive is not enough. At the same time, genuine use does not necessarily require high sales volumes. The assessment depends on the relevant market, the nature of the goods or services, and the scale and frequency of use.

Use by a licensee or another party with the proprietor’s consent can also count. A slightly different version of the registered mark may qualify where the differences do not alter its distinctive character.

What happened to Airbnb

A recent example involves Airbnb in a General Court ruling. The Court upheld the EUIPO Board of Appeal’s decision to partially revoke the AIRBNB word mark for lack of genuine trademark use across a range of goods in Class 9 and services in Classes 35, 37, 39, 40, 41 and 42, among others advertising services.

For advertising services, the Court reiterated that genuine use requires assisting third parties in promoting their goods or services. Airbnb’s evidence showed only promotion of its own platform, which is considered self promotion and not genuine use for advertising services. As a result, those services were removed from the scope of protection.

Why This Matters

This type of result is not always problematic. Trademark protection is defined by legal requirements, but the decisions that shape it come from the business strategy. Effective protection depends on understanding the company’s current activities and future direction. As the business evolves, what is relevant to protect evolves as well.

Many businesses secure a wider set of goods and services in the early stages to preserve flexibility, sometimes including advertising services as a defensive measure. Trademark protection is legal in form, but strategic in substance. Companies file what they believe they may need, knowing that priorities shift as the business evolves. Over time, genuine use becomes the factor that defines the actual scope of protection.

Business Strategy and Trademark Strategy

A trademark strategy does not stand on its own. It follows the broader business strategy. The business decides which markets matter, which offerings scale and where value is created. The trademark strategy should reflect these choices and evolve as the company’s plans change.

When business strategy and brand protection strategy are aligned, trademark protection remains relevant and enforceable. This alignment strengthens the brand’s market position and the company’s ability to act against misuse.

What This Means

For companies, the key takeaway is that effective brand protection requires more than registering marks. It requires an understanding of how the business operates. The trademark use requirement means that registration is only the starting point. Actual use maintains strength and protects long term brand value.

Understanding the brand strategy is essential for an effective trademark strategy and for building a resilient brand protection strategy over time.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If your company would like a review of its trademark portfolio or guidance on developing a best in class brand protection strategy, please contact us at Abrande.

How to prove genuine use

When genuine use is challenged, the evidence should establish the place, time, extent and nature of the use. Useful records may include:

  • dated invoices and sales reports;

  • packaging, labels and product catalogues;

  • dated website, app-store and marketplace records;

  • advertising supported by reach, traffic or transaction data;

  • distribution and licensing records; and

  • documents connecting the mark to the exact goods or services concerned.

A logo appearing on a website may show that the brand exists, but it does not automatically prove genuine use for every item in the registration.

Source:

Airbnb case

https://www.euipo.europa.eu/en/law/recent-case-law/self-promotion-isn-t-an-advertising-service-gc-clarifies-and-narrows-the-scope-of-protection-for-airbnb-trade-mark

Invalidity EUIPO

https://www.euipo.europa.eu/en/help-centre/tm/faq-invalidity-and-revocation

More content like this that you may find interesting...

Trademark vs Copyright vs Design vs Patent: What IP Should Your Business Protect?

Most businesses need a combination of rights. Start by identifying what competitors could copy, block, disclose, or force you to change; confirm ownership; and address time-sensitive patent or design filings before launch. Because intellectual property rights are territorial, your strategy should reflect where you operate, manufacture, sell, and plan to expand.

EB

Edvin Brobeck

Apple’s IPHONE DUO Filing: How Quiet Priority Filings Can Delay a Brand Leak

Apple appears to have filed IPHONE DUO first in Liechtenstein, then used the six-month Paris Convention priority period to expand its protection around the public launch. A lower-visibility first filing can delay a brand leak, but it does not create worldwide rights or guarantee secrecy. The strategy works only when the owner, trademark scope, clearance work and later filing deadlines are planned carefully. The practical lesson is to coordinate trademark filings with the wider launch timetable rather than copy a particular jurisdiction by default.

SF

Simon Fouladi

What Counts as Trademark Infringement? 10 Practical Examples

You find a competitor using a name that looks uncomfortably close to yours. Or your business receives a letter claiming that its new name, logo, domain, advertisement, or product listing infringes an earlier trademark. Trademark infringement can occur when a business commercially uses an identical or similar sign without permission in a way that conflicts with an earlier trademark. The central question is often whether customers are likely to believe the businesses are connected. Trademarks with a reputation may receive broader protection even where confusion is not established.

SF

Simon Fouladi

Let's protect what you've built

Book a consultation with one of our IP experts. We'll review your situation and outline a clear path forward — no obligation.